Tag Archives: drone

Purdue researchers create AI-based “hummingbird” drone

Image by Domenic Hoffmann from Pixabay

Indiana-based Purdue University said on 9 May that researchers had engineered drones that “behave like hummingbirds”, trained by machine learning algorithms based on various techniques the bird naturally uses every day.

This means that – after learning from a simulation – the robot “knows” how to fly and hover on its own like a hummingbird would, such as discerning when to perform an escape maneuver, allowing them to move “better through collapsed buildings and other cluttered spaces to find trapped victims”.

A combination of AI and flexible flapping wings allows the robot to “teach itself” new tricks. For example, it can’t yet “see” but senses by touching surfaces. Each touch alters an electrical current, which the researchers realized they could track.

“The robot can essentially create a map without seeing its surroundings,” Xinyan Deng, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at Purdue, said in a statement. “This could be helpful in a situation when the robot might be searching for victims in a dark place – and it means one less sensor to add when we do give the robot the ability to see.”

While drones cannot be made infinitely smaller as they would be unable to generate enough lift to support their weight, hummingbirds do not use conventional dynamics and have extremely resilient wings.

“The physics is simply different; the aerodynamics is inherently unsteady, with high angles of attack and high lift,” Deng said. “This makes it possible for smaller, flying animals to exist, and also possible for us to scale down flapping wing robots.”

According to Purdue, researchers have long tried to “decode” hummingbird flight to facilitate robots flying where larger aircraft cannot. For example, California-based drone developer and manufacturer AeroVironment was commissioned by DARPA – a US Department of Defence agency – in 2011 to build a robotic hummingbird that was heavier than a real one but not as fast. It had helicopter-like flight controls and limited manoeuvrability, and required a human to operate the remote control at all times.

Deng’s research group and fellow collaborators studied hummingbirds themselves over multiple summers in Montana, documenting key hummingbird manoeuvres, such as rapid 180-degree turns, and translated them into computer algorithms that a computer could learn from when hooked up to a simulation.

Further study of the physics of insects and hummingbirds allowed researchers at Purdue to create robots that are smaller than hummingbirds – and even as small as insects – without compromising the way they fly. According to Deng, a smaller drone with a greater wing flapping frequency will fly most efficiently.

The drones have 3D-printed bodies, wings made from carbon fibre and laser-cut membranes. One weighs as little as 12 grams – the weight of the average adult hummingbird – and another insect-sized drone weighing just one gram. The hummingbird-sized drone can lift up to 27 grams.

Drones with higher lift give researchers more room to eventually add a battery and sensing technology, such as a camera or GPS, and while the drone currently needs to be tethered to an energy source, the researchers reportedly say that this will not be the case for much longer. It only requires two motors to fly and can independently control each wing, which is how flying animals are capable of performing highly agile manoeuvres in nature.

The drones can fly as silently as a real hummingbird, making them ideal for covert operations, and can stay steady through turbulence, which researchers demonstrated by testing the dynamically scaled wings in an oil tank.

Robotic hummingbirds could both help with search-and-rescue missions and allow biologists to study hummingbirds more reliably in their natural environment through the senses of a realistic robot.

“An actual hummingbird has multiple groups of muscles to do power and steering strokes, but a robot should be as light as possible, so that you have maximum performance on minimal weight,” Deng said. “We learned from biology to build the robot, and now biological discoveries can happen with extra help from robots.”

Early stages of the work, including the Montana-based experiments in collaboration with researchers from the University of Montana, were financially supported by the National Science Foundation. The project is related to Purdue’s 150th anniversary Giant Leaps celebration, acknowledging the university’s global advancements in AI, algorithms and automation as part of Purdue’s 150th anniversary.

The researchers will present their work on 20 May at the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Montreal with a YouTube video available here if you’re unable to attend. Simulations of the technology are available open-source on GitHub.

British drone owners may be charged annual fee under new proposals

The UK Civil Aviation Administration (CAA) has launched a consultation on introducing a license fee of £16.50 per year to cover the costs of Britain’s new drone registration scheme with a final decision expected by the regulator in July 2019.

In 2018, the country’s government decided to mandate a drone registration and education scheme to “strengthen the accountability of drone users and their awareness of how to fly their drones safely”, a requirement that is now enshrined within UK law.

A number of other countries already have – or are developing – similar schemes and the CAA expects that it will soon become a requirement under “wider international law”. For example, new EU rules will mean each member state has to hold a national register of drone users. France has a free registration scheme, and similar schemes in the US and Ireland cost US$5 and €5 respectively.

The UK’s scheme will require all those operating drones and model aircraft (that weigh between 250 grams and 20 kilograms) in UK airspace to register by the end of November 2019 and to take an online safety test with a fine of £1000 for noncompliance.

The CAA said it had been developing the technology needed to implement the registrations scheme since summer 2018 with input from the Department of Transport (DoT) and unnamed stakeholders.

The government has provided a “significant amount of taxpayer funding” to cover costs of developing the scheme up until the beginning of October, the CAA said, but after that the cost of running the scheme will be “borne by those who use it under the user pays principle”.

This is because the CAA as a statutory body is required to recover its costs from the entities it regulates. The agency uses the same funding model for its other regulatory functions, including regulation of pilots, engineers, general aviation, airlines and airports.

The charge covers IT hosting and security costs; CAA personnel and helpdesk; identity verification; a national education and awareness campaign; and costs of further upgrades to the initial drone registration service. The amount is based on an assumption of 170,000 registrations over the initial 18 month period.

The CAA said it would review the drone charge after its introduction and implement any changes from April 2021, including considering whether a three year rather than annual renewal period would be more appropriate. It believes that the proposed charge “represents a balance between keeping the charge for registration low and ensuring that the scheme covers its costs”.

Respondents to the consultation are being asked to provide answers to three key questions:

1. What is your view on the CAA’s proposed charge, in terms of the level and structure of the charge?

2. Do you have alternative ideas about how the CAA could cover the costs of running the registration scheme?

3. Are the CAA’s estimated volumes appropriate for the make-up of drone operators in the UK, based on existing sources of data and your own observations?

The CAA is asking drone users, model aircraft operators, relevant industry stakeholders and members of the public to submit answers to the consultation using the CAA Drone Registration Scheme Consultation online submission form. The consultation closes on 7 June 2019.

The FVP UK association of recreational radio control drone and model aircraft pilots, which represents at least 4000 flyers, described the charge as “absolutely outrageous” and alleged that “you get absolutely nothing to show for it”.

In a call to action posted on its website, the association said it was “excessive and a barrier to participation in the hobby”, and suggested that the registration scheme would be “detrimental to the future of unmanned aircraft flying in the UK”.

It would place requirements upon operators and owners that are “are excessive and more onerous than those for manned aviation”, it claimed, alleging that the consultation reveals that “key policy decisions” had been added in the absence of publicly promised consultations or further discussions.